Cool concept with a good round-up, but I'll be damned if I could figure out how the voting was supposed to work. I was so dumbfounded that I wondered if I turned into Emmitt Smith.
Read an article about DNA computing. This is old stuff and there is no proof it can ever work to do what the people who want funding for it claim in order to get said funding. Quantum computers however will probably be much more practical before DNA computers could ever work.
How is support for a candidate who shares your views not 'credible'? Personally I don't feel the need to justify my support for any candidate for office on digg, but the connection you draw between political support and off the wall conspiracy theories should frankly be insulting to anyone who has ever supported any candidate. Thought crime? red line bf goodrich tires
So this person you marry will be required to be STD free? Not that that is bad, I just laugh at the people (men and women alike) who enjoy the freedom and pleasure of a many-partnered sex life. Then find a person they would consider marrying who led the exact same lifestyle, but were not as fortunate and acquired an STD. So now the person without the STD questions whether they want to marry the one with the STD even though they led the same lifestyle, but the other was unlucky. Maybe people should start cancer screening their future life partner prospects?
Works for Zimbabwe!
Dugg for comparison to Snake Plissken. Exactly what i thought.
It'd be awesome to try and figure out the odds of that happening. Must feel pretty special, I guess.
that is seriously old
rofl