|
Country and Minority Flags of Europe EU Country Profiles
& Immigration Info
Minority Languages
& Identities in Europe
About the EHL/The Staff/Contact
Us
Submit Articles & Content
Online Language Translation
Join our Mailing List
Donate to the EHL
Bookmark
the EHL to Favourites!


Click a Flag to Translate
• Ethnic/religious
groups of Habsburg Empire
• Historical
breakup of Yugoslavia ('91-'09)
• Muslim
populations in European countries
• History
of Christianization of Europe
• Soviet
Union, Communist influence
• Map
of European ethnic groups
• Map of Fascism
in Europe (1922-75)
• History
of Islamic conquest in Europe
• Religions
& ethnic groups in Russia
• Detailed
map of French colonization
• Detailed
map of British colonization
• Napoleon's
conquests & legacy
• Ethnic
& religious map of pre-Nazi Poland
--MORE &
NON-ENGLISH--
• Pecs, Hungary: collision
point between
Muslim and Christian empires
• Auschwitz and Birkenau
• Poland's
resistance to Nazis in pictures
• Muhammad
cartoon crisis in pictures
• Stalin's
private summer home
• Ravenna:
capital of Gothic empire
• Czar Nicholas
II's Ukrainian palace
• European
traditional cultural costumes
• Inside the Vatican,
house of all wealth
• Banknotes/currencies
of Europe
• Croatia's
Dubrovnik, untarnished gem
--MORE
& NON-ENGLISH--

• Islamic Mujahidin
vs. Christian Spain
• Poland-Lithuania vs. Teutonic Order
• Nevskiy's Russia vs. German Crusaders
• Prussia
vs. France (Nazi Propaganda)
• Libya: Europe
will soon be Islamic
• Ivan the Terrible
vs. Muslim Tatars
• Soviet
Propaganda: Defeat of Germany
--MORE
& NON-ENGLISH--

• An analysis
of Mussolini's 1938 racialist legislation
• The disastrous
effects of Soviet collectivization on Kazakhstan
• Changing meaning
of Italian identity under Fascist rule
• Yugoslavia's independent
break from East and West
• The Galicians: the
Celts of Spain
• The modern
Macedonian Slavs and Alexander the Great
• An argument for
the Romanians' links to ancient Dacians
• Mussolini's
Italian death camp for Jews, Slovenes, and Marxists
• The disappeared
Jews of Hungary and the Arrow Cross regime
• The Gypsies in history and today,
Europe's public enemy
• History
of Jihad in Chechnya vs. Russians
• History
of the Muslim Tatars in Eastern Europe
• Post-WWII expulsion of 10 million
ethnic German civilians
• Ethnic
& religious history of Serbs, Croats, & Bosnians
• Breakaway
states and independence movements in Europe
• The ancient Germanic Runic alphabet
and Runestones
• Teutonic
Order and their 800-year legacy in Eastern Europe
• 460-year
struggle for Albanian homeland, and 540 for Kosovo
• 2,800-year-old white mummies of China,
bringers of Buddhism?
• Alexander the
Great's Greek descendents in Pakistan?
• Visual History
of Yugoslavia and its breakup (1918-2008)
--MORE
& NON-ENGLISH-- |
|
Inside Muslim Turkey;
is Turkey European, or right for the European Union?
by James Mayfield (Chairman, European Heritage Library)
Print
this Article • About
the Author • Bibliography/Sources
This is an article on the
cultural, historical, religious, social, and political dimensions
of Muslim Turkey, complete with photos, from my 2007 vacation.
It investigates the issue of Islam in Europe as well as the
controversial question of Turkey's possible entry into the
European Union. Is Turkey by any means European?
Turkey -- Türkiye -- تركيا

English name: Turkey
Local name: Türkiye
Population: 71,158,647
Religion: Muslim 99.8% (mostly Sunni and Alevite), other (Armenian
Orthodox) 0.2%
Language: Turkish, with near-illegal Kurdish minority, Armenian
Ethnic groups: Turkish 80%, 20% Kurdish, minute Armenian &
Greek
Average fertility/woman: 1.89 per woman
Migration rate: 0 migrant(s)/1,000 population
Per capita average income: $9,000
Unemployment: officially 10.2%
Population below poverty line: officially 20%
Turkish immigration populations: Germany, Bulgaria, Greece,
France, Netherlands, Austria
Source: CIA World Factbook
I traveled to Turkey not only with a great fascination for
Islam, but also in order to investigate the question: are
Turkey and the Turks by any means European culturally, religiously,
politically, and historically? Are they an appropriate option
for ascension to the European Union, as has recently become
so controversial? Having been to most European countries,
I discovered a rather universal objection (and a very one-sided
and exaggerated one at that) to Turkish immigrants as being
of a diametrically polar culture and history. They are depicted
as "Muslims" and foreigners who exploit the liberal
social and economic programs of the European countries to
which they immigrate. Many find it bothersome and ironic that
European states struggled for over 400 years to keep the Turks
out of Europe (the Ottoman Islamic conquest) only to open
the door for them today. They are one of the largest immigrant
groups to Europe, and their "Muslim" character greatly
ignites dormant inter-ethnic tensions in supposedly "liberal"
Europe. Having studied a growing cultural and inter-ethnic
conflict between most European societies and "Muslim
immigrants" from the Middle East and Turkey, I was anxious
to analyze the true cultural, religious, and political dimensions
of this ancient and unique country that expresses traits of
European and Middle Eastern origin from their perspective.
Turkey is relatively new
to tourism due largely to a popular (and ignorant) stigma
of Westerners that the Middle East or the Islamic world are
inherently dangerous or volatile. These typical stereotypes
are by no means appropriate for Turkey: it is highly developed,
civilized, comparatively prosperous, politically ultra-secular,
and educated. Turks have spent the last 80 years trying to
prove that they are distinct from the Arabs, the Middle East,
and the typical obsolescence of the Islamic world. The hijab
(headscarf) is banned in all government offices, schools,
and in all state offices (including employees of hospitals).
The Kurdish Sunni and Alevite minority is responsible for
nearly all of Turkey's terrorism (primarily by the PKK [the
Kurdish Workers' Party] terrorist group), which is further
incited by American support for the Kurd minority in northern
Iraq and Syria. The majority of the Kurds are in the far east.
The Kurds, an Iranian ethnic group with a distinct cultural
and religious heritage to the Turks, are victims of tremendous
political discrimination that makes their language illegal
in most government offices and on most relevision channels.
This intolerance (which is, in reality, merely a response
to the Kurds' indefatiguable perfidity and terrorism against
the Turkish government) is a major source of criticism by
the European Union and the US that depicts Turkey as too right-wing
to be a member of the liberal West. Its consistent cycle of
military governments, brutal opposition to religious views
in government, and its refusal to admit its involvement in
the Armenian Genocide of World War I further makes right-wing
Turkey marginalized from being "politically European."
Historical background
as proof of Turkey's non-European quality
Despite Turkey's modern ultra-secular
(laicite) face, the Turks manifested a very different form
of political Islam in their long history. Its history defines
it as non-European. Less than 10% of its territory is even
in Europe (Istanbul). For brief historical background, the
Turks arrived in Anatolia (where Turkey lies) by the 10th
century, converting to a very liberal form of Sunni Islam
on the way that became progressively more conservative. The
Turks are of a race and language completely unrelated to the
Arabs and Persians. They quickly created two successive, massive
empires -- the Seljuks and Ottomans -- that engulfed most
of the Middle East. Adopting a more strict and political Islam
as the representative shadows of God's will and law (Sharia)
on earth, the Ottomans delivered the blade of jihad into Europe,
forever obliterating an already-collapsed Byzantine Empire
and conquering what are now Serbia, Bosnia, Albania, Bulgaria,
Romania, Greece, Macedonia, southern Croatia and Hungary,
and southern Ukraine by the 16th century. Churches were burnt
to the ground or converted to mosques, like the holiest church
in Orthodox Christendom, the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople.
Constantinople became Istanbul, the capital of the Ottoman
Empire and the cultural (not political) capital of Turkey
today. All Christian families were forced to pay exorbitant
taxes despite being barely able to feed themselves as poor
farmers, and each family was obligated to forfeit a number
of children forever to be converted to Islam and join the
elite Janissary legions, often to return to fight their own
countrymen. Nonetheless, it must be acknowledged that the
Ottoman Empire was far more practical and tolerant of religious
minorities than other Muslim powers of the period in that
so long as they paid huge taxes (jizyah) and submitted to
second-class status, their religious practice was (at least
superficially) tolerated. Both the typical European depiction
of a brutal army of church-burning Mujahidin is oversimplified,
as is the modern academic portrayal of a tolerant and multi-cultural
Muslim power, one that conquered most of the Balkans without
any provocation. These debates notwithstanding, Europeans
today have not forgotten their long struggle to resist the
incoming jihad, forever labeling the Turks as a non-European
foreign culture that is unfeasible for joining the European
Union.
By World War I, the Ottoman
Empire was long behind European powers. As a practical solution
to Turkey's backward condition, far-right ultranationalists
under Mustafa Kemal "Atatürk" (Father of the Turks)
abolished the sultanate by 1923, banned the Arabic alphabet,
made "European" dress compulsory, adopted a European
constitutional format, and forged an ultra-secular system
that crippled the dominance of Islamic clerics, Sufi mystics,
and banned the headscarf in all government offices. As a result
of these reforms, the Turks have a complicated society: a
deeply religious and conservative Muslim culture with a secular
"European" political system. Their political efforts
to become "European" cannot override the distinctly
non-European culture, identity, religion, and heritage of
the Turkish people, a people that Europeans considered their
arch-nemesis until the 20th century. Such a non-European people
is inappropriate for the European Union in any sense of the
word, especially when Europe's Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, and
Moldova are not even considered to become members! If liberal-democratic
political considerations were the only criterion by which
nations were admitted to the EU, then any democracy in an
ever-expanding radius is a potential member, including Armenia,
Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Iran, and Tunisia, -- all
just as "European" as Turkey is.

A statue of Mustafa Kemal, the founding father, next to a
massive Islamic flag.

My photo of a huge gallery of famous sultans' tombs inside
a mosque, the same sultans against whom European societies
struggled so intently to be free. (click to enlarge)
Turkish society and culture,
just as magnificently radiant as they are non-European
Turkey is far from a desolate
"Oriental" nation that one may ignorantly assume.
Istanbul is arguably the greatest city in the world in terms
of its overall beauty, its archaeology, its long history of
relics and buildings from distinct civilizations that the
Turks destroyed, and the serenity of Islamic culture as manifest
in Istanbul's breathtaking architecture. Although Istanbul
(Constantinople) was built to its glory by the Greek predecessors
(the Byzantine Empire), Istanbul has evolved during Islamic
rule to have a very Muslim character. The notion that Turks
have forged a multi-cultural civilization that straddles European
and "Middle Eastern" cultures is improvident and
perhaps Orientalist. Instead, the Turks have forged
a civilization and culture that is incredibly distinct from
the Middle East and Arab culture, but only culturally "European"
in the sense that the Turks possess ancient European cities
that they conquered. Nonetheless, Turkey is a magnificent
nation with a highly traditional and overall conservative
culture despite its image of being comparatively liberal.
Nowhere else but in Muslim Turkey do nationalism and pride
in culture, heritage, history, their distinct race and language,
the Islamic faith, and tradition coalesce so strongly into
national consciousness. Aside from the endless mosques, there
are thousands upon thousands of massive Turkish flags proudly
announcing the Turkish heritage rooted in the star and crescent
of Islam. Nearly every home has a Turkish flag on display
for all to see, often right next to government-ordered sets
of 20-flag standards or 25-foot massive flags in the center
of town. The Turks embrace their secular politics today with
great prescience: by being politically secular but culturally
a staunchly Islamic nation, the Turks can distinguish themselves
from the Arabs they deem so backward at the same time as they
trade amply with Europe and America as well as the Islamic
world, without limiting the importance of Islam in daily life.
This ulterior motive must be emphasized; this secularism does
not imply a liberal, open, and progressive culture fitting
for the West in any sense of the word, but is only intended
to forge the most politically and fiscally auspicious form
of government. The majesty and sincerity of Islam is evident
in all of Turkish culture, its infinite mosques and minarets,
the conservative dress of its people even in scorching heat,
and the inexhaustible prayer-calls (Ezan) from complimentary
muazzim (prayer-callers). The Turks' tireless effort to distinguish
themselves from the "Orient" has made them of no
comparison with the rest of the "Middle East," but
not at all by process of elimination automatically a part
of Europe. Also, although polygamy (legal up to four wives
in Islam) is banned in Turkey, the traditional Muslim marriage
has survived overall: most Turkish women still receive dowry
in the form of money, carpet, or other heirloom to cement
the Muslim marriage.

My photo of flags everywhere in Kusadasi. This is not simply
a trait of monuments; such is seen with every turn of the
head. (click to enlarge)

Islam, the Ottoman heritage, and Turkish national pride are
indivisible here.
Turkey is reportedly 99.8%
Muslim (majority Sunni). The vast majority of the rural areas
are very conservative, whilst the cities are reputed to be
more "progressive" (liberal). Even in Istanbul,
though, most Turks are religious, refuse to drink alcohol,
attend mosques, and cover their heads in accordance with the
Turkish interpretation of the Qur'an and the Hadith (deeds
of the Prophet). Mosques are omnipotent and ubiquitous; mosques
built 400 years ago stand in flawless condition alongside
new minarets. Having even abolished the last Islamic caliphate
in 1923, Turks have indeed succeeded in protecting their political
and jurisprudential system from the influence of clerics and
imams. The secular government funds the construction of mosques
and pays their imams government salaries. This is intended
to halt inimical radicalism or anti-government ranting to
the massive audiences that mosques enjoy in secular Turkey.
The balance has been successful thus far. When the loud pencefold
prayer (five per day) is not being echoed with synchronism
between the endless mosques in the nation for several minutes
at a time, one can hear Islamic lectures, chants, and prayers
from some mosques' loudspeakers throughout the day, reaffirming
the Turks as a Muslim people. Stars and crescents not on flags
are visible all throughout the city, distinguishing the Turks'
usage of these symbols from being not simply their traditional
flag, but rather an expression of their Muslim heritage and
a recollection of the believed revelation of the Qur'an to
the Prophet during a crescent moon more than 1,500 years ago.
Hundreds of people can be seen walking into each mosque all
throughout the day. Women in veils or full burqas, men with
regular conservative clothes, men with full beards and also
Wahabbi-style Saudi outfits can be seen hurrying to prayer.
Men and women can be seen performing ablutions (washing the
hands, head, and feet, called Wudhu) in local fountains with
Arabic writing around them before entering. The genders are
strictly segregated inside and outside of mosques during religious
rituals and prayer, virtually in separate rooms. Istanbul
is nonetheless one of the few places in the world that allow
infidels to enter mosques outside of prayer time. The “whirling
darvishes” (or dervishes), Sufi monks who stand and spin about
to near themselves to Allah, are celebrated and sold all throughout
the city in pewter, plastic, and wood, as the Sufis played
a large role in the conversion of world peoples to Islam despite
Atatürk's policy of abolishing most Sufi lodges.
The Blue Mosque (Mavi Cami)
across from the Hagia Sophia in the center of Istanbul is
one of the greatest artistic and architectural achievements
in history. It is one of the most ornate mosques of the world,
and in stupendous condition (see the photos below). It was
built to announce the glory of Islam and the Ottoman domain,
and to compliment the nearby Hagia Sophia -- the most important
church in Orthodox Christendom -- that they converted to a
mosque to signify the triumph of the jihad in 1453, in fulfillment
of the Qur'an's foreshadowing that the Romans (Byzantines)
would one day lose a great battle.

My photo of Istanbul from the sea. Notice the massive minarets
everywhere (Suleyman mosque left, Ayasofya right). (click
to enlarge)

My photo of the magnificent Blue Mosque. (click to
enlarge)

My photo of the Blue Mosque interior. (click to enlarge)

My photo of the Blue Mosque interior. (click to enlarge)

My photo of another interior shot. No infidels (Jews, Christians)
allowed in the main area. Women are segregated.

My photo of another interior wall with Arabic inscription
on a plaque.

My photo of the Blue Mosque's ceiling.

My photo of an ablution bath for ritual bathing under an Arabic
verse from al-Qur'an.
As has been exhaustingly
discussed on the political floor as well as in the classroom,
the headscarf issue cannot be ignored. Aside from the Islamic
religion, which is rejected and found incompatible with European
cultures by most Europeans, the issue of the headscarf is
a common conflict in the European theatre. The millions of
Muslims who immigrate to Europe (illegally and legally) are
more and more being forbidden to wear the headscarf in public
and in schools, with some claiming that it has no place in
Europe and others arguing that it is an object of female oppression.
Turkey absolutely disallows the hijab (headscarf) in all public
schools, universities, public offices, and other institutions
in this ultra-centralized right-wing state. As a result, thousands
of Turks are forced to leave Turkey to get a higher education
[2] because of their refusal to unveil, including the daughters
of the president and prime minister [3]. Today, the majorty
of Turkish women still do wear veils or headscarves (at least
60% [1]), arguing that it is an element of Islamic heritage
expected of them by their families. Many do not cover their
heads (especially the youth), with some arguing that it is
limiting and uncomfortably hot, others that their love of
God lies in their hearts, and others arguing that it makes
them look like the Arabs they deem so primitive. Some women
can be seen wearing the Taliban-style burqas. The government
of Recep Tayyip Erdogan has struggled with great hardship
to fulfill the wishes of most Turks and legalize the hijab
once again, only to be overturned by the military-dominated
Constitutional Court after the measures passed parliament
successfully. Although the European Union has championed the
right of women to dress and worship freely, the European Court
of Human Rights upheld Turkey's decision to ban the hijab
as in accordance with human rights, arguing that it protects
women from abuse and allows them to enter the modern world.
The Netherlands, France, states in Germany, and Spain have
all considered or partially initiated measures to ban the
headscarf in all schools, ostensibly to protect them from
inter-racial violence but surreptitiously for many solely
in the interests of curbing the role of Muslims in European
societies. The headscarf issue greatly illustrates and re-ignites
the cultural, social, religious, and social polarity between
Turkish immigrants and native European societies to which
they immigrate, further distancing them from being identified
as "European" by the great majority of Europeans.
So too, the consistent phenomenon of Turkish military coups
to block a perceived "Islamization" of Turkey has
been criticized as far too right-wing and un-democratic for
the liberal European Union.

My photo of Muslims performing ritual collective bathing.
Women are segregated. (click to enlarge)
The state cult of Turkey's
Atatürk is unparalleled, arguably only outmatched by Ayatollah
Khomeini of Iran and Kim Il Sung of North Korea. Having brought
the Turkish Ottoman state from complete economic and political
collapse into a powerful and proud new Turkish nation and
military power that expelled most of the post-war imperial
powers and obliterated the Armenian and Kurdish revolts, this
culture-creating leader is celebrated with a portrait in nearly
every major building, every office building, every police
station and shack, in every public monument, and in hundreds
of homes and ships. He acts today as a paradigm for all future
politics of Turkey, which is why current efforts to Islamicize
politically-secular Turkey are met with a sizable public outcry.
Beside his portraits and statues are dozens of flags, some
stretching 20-feet in length, to celebrate independence Turkish
nationhood. Some of his statues are oddly adorned with Arabic
script and quotes from al-Qur'an that he scrupulously sought
to limit. Atatürk and his affiliated nationalist armies are
generally accepted (outside of Turkey) to be guilty of some
of the worst atrocities of the 20th century, including the
Armenian Genocide that led to the murder or starvation of
millions and the massive exodus of most of the Armenian race
to leave Turkey, the obliteration of Armenian and Kurdish
sovereignty after World War I, and intensive wars with the
Greek nationalists that caused every ethnic Greek to be expelled
from Turkey (and all Turks from Greece as well). As Turkey
lionizes Atatürk as an immaculate hero, the Turkish government
and most of the society absolutely refuses to acknowledge
any wrongdoing, and as a result is criticized by the EU and
especially the USA as being guilty of war crimes and racial
discrimination. So too, brutal Turkish ethnic and linguistic
discrimination against Greeks, Armenians, and especially Kurds
is a cause for concern in the liberal West. Acknowledging
the alleged genocide and any racism is considered a prerequisite
for joining the EU. It must be acknowledged that the Armenians
were involved in massive revolt during the war that caused
the Turkish reprisal, which is precisely the Turkish argument.

A white imperialist sitting with shoes on the steps of the
mosque. The sign reads "sitting on the steps is absolutely
forbidden." Turks look at her with rage.

My photo of the ancient government-subsidized silkworm extraction
art for rugmaking. (click to enlarge)

My photo of the Greco-Roman Celsus Library in Kusadasi, considered
one of the greatest ancient monuments still standing. (click
to enlarge)

My photo of a downtown Turkish bazaar only 20 paces from a
lovely mosque. (click to enlarge)

My photo of downtown Kusadasi with a mosque in view next to
restaurants and a huqqah bar. (click to enlarge)
Just walking through the
cities of the western coast (especially Istanbul and Kusadashi),
one can encounter Byzantine Greek Christian treasures before
the Turkish conquest, pre-Christian Greek cities preserved
in entirety, Roman arches, and ancient Iranian tombs. At the
center of Istanbul stands the massive Hagia Sophia/Ayasofya,
one of the most radiant structures ever conceived. Built over
pagan Greek foundations by the all-conquering Byzantine Emperor
Justinian in the 6th century as the center of the Orthodox
faith, the massive domed structure was the largest in the
world for many centuries. Its majesty, according to the Slavic
Primary Chronicle, caused the East Slavs to convert to Orthodoxy
as Vladimir the Great's emissaries returned from Constantinople
to tell him of their awe-inspiring journey. When the jihad
of the Ottomans succeeded in conquering a long-dead Byzantine
Empire in 1453 under Mehmet the Conquerer, they removed all
of the treasures therein, cemented over all the icons of Christ
and Mary in the interior, and converted the church into a
mosque by placing four minarets around it. Nearly 1,000 years
of Orthodox Christian history were obliterated, solidifying
the triumph of the jihad over a very frightened Europe. Even
in secular, overall irreligious Europe, the longstanding antagonism
between the Turkish and European cultures, identities, religions,
and nations cannot be dismissed in the pragmatic and politically-minded
interests of the multi-cultural European Union on a whim.
500 years of hatred and disdain cannot be forgotten, a conflict
that is further compounded by widespread negativity of European
societies for Turkish "Muslim" immigrants in Europe
today.
The Hagia Sophia is now a
museum open to all. The interior is ancient, tarnished, and
fading as expected from its age. It is rich in ancient Orthodox
Christian mosaics and frescoes of John the Baptist, Jesus,
and the Saints dating over 1,500 years of age. All evidence
of Jesus was entirely erased or burnt when the jihad reached
the Byzantine capital. Although the prophets Jesus and Mary
(Maryam) are greatly revered in Islam, the depiction and veneration
of such holy men is deemed haram (forbidden), and very little
importance was given to the icons that the Muslims considered
mere pictures. This was later uncovered when the building
became a museum, and can be seen today with much of it removed
due to age and peeling. The building is almost entirely in
reconstruction with painters carefully repainting the surface.
Original massive plaques cover the walls of the building with
verses from al-Qur'an and the holy 99 names of Allah all around
the massive overhead dome. The original Mihrab (the gate in
the center of the mosque showing the direction of Makkah to
which all must pray) and Minbar (the steps to heaven from
which the imam or mullah speaks to the talibani) are in perfect
golden condition. Only 200 paces from the huge mosque, the
walls of Constantinople that the Turks struggled for years
to overrun can be touched. One can even see the black marks
where the Mujahidin's cannons bombarded the Christian gates
for years and years before final victory.
In conclusion,
traveling to Turkey was one of the most serene experiences
of my life. It reversed pre-conceived notions of a "Middle
Eastern" and "Muslim" Turkey, it gave me a
heartfelt appreciation for the beauty of Islam and the sincerity
of its adherents that inspired me to devote years to studying
the Qur'an and Islamic history due to an intense lifelong
veneration for God, and also gave me an invaluable opportunity
to study both sides of this growing European social conflict.
It allowed me to see that the Turks are by no means the lazy,
leeching, perfidious, and inherently terroristic Muslims that
many Europeans readily describe. It also greatly resonated
in me the reality that the Turks by no means have a European
history, culture, identity, heritage, history, religion, or
political system. Widespread European cultural disdain for
Turks and Muslims will not be assuaged by the entry of Turkey
to the European Union, nor will Europeans forget the 400 years
of brutal inter-religious and inter-cultural war that indefatiguably
struggled to keep Turkish Muslims out of Europe altogether.
So too, aside from being from two inherently incompatible
cultural worlds, the far-right militarism, ultra-nationalism,
revisionism, and racial discrimination that is so dominant
in Turkey directly contradicts the liberalism that the European
Union commands, especially when it eschews such political
growing behavior in Germany and England! When Russia, Ukraine,
Moldova, and Belarus cannot join the European Union, Turkey
surely cannot be allowed to do so. If Turkey were to join,
it would instantly, by population, become the second most-powerful
and largest member, only behind Germany. Libyan Islamist dictator
Mummar Qadafi has even described Turkish entry to the European
Union as a "trojan horse" for Islamic terrorism
into Europe and the overall conversion of Europe to becoming
Muslim-majority (see this video).
Ultimately, political objectives to promote Turkish ascension
to the European Union remain no more than a desire for completely
improvident multi-cultural union that completely ignores a
half-millennium of bitter inter-cultural discomfort that is
only growing in Europe today, as immigrants from a very foreign
and disliked culture come to (as Europeans see it) exploit
already-struggling European economies.

My photo of an ancient Roman water reservoir.

My photo of the exterior of the legendary Hagia Sophia --
one of the greatest buildings ever built. (click to
enlarge)

My photo of the interior of the Hagia Sophia. (click
to enlarge)

My photo of another interior shot. (click to enlarge)

The center of the Ayasofya mosque: the Mihrab. This shows
the direction of Makkah.

An ancient ablution area for ritual bathing outside the Hagia
Sophia.

My photo of a covered Christian mosaic in the Ayasofya. It
was sealed after the jihad. (click to enlarge)

My photo of the entrance to the Grand Bazaar, with Arabic
script atop.

My photo of the interior of the Grand Bazaar.

My photo of the entrance to the Topkapi sultan's palace. (click
to enlarge)

My photo of the exit gate to the palace.

My photo of a sultan's mausoleum. (click to enlarge)

My photo of a ceiling of a mosque in the Topkapi palace, the
sultan's main home.

My photo of Mehmet II the Conquerer's sword with verses from
al-Qur'an written on it. He is the sultan whose jihad ended
the Byzantine Empire forever.
________________________________________
ABOUT
THE AUTHOR:
James Mayfield is a historian
and the Chairman of the European Heritage Library. I have
a Cum Laude BA in History with a Minor in Germanic Studies
(language and history), am presently working for my Masters
in History, and plan to immediately progress to my PhD Doctorate.
I have a special academic interest in Europe's diverse ethnic
identities, languages, and cultures, and the political struggles
of native European and immigrant minority identities. See
my staff entry for more information.
BIBLIOGRAPHY/SOURCES
USED:
Personal photos, observations,
interviews
CIA World Factbook
[1] BBC Europe, “Women condemn
Turkey constitution,” BBC, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7025294.stm.
[2] Christina Lamb. “Headscarf
war threatens to split Turkey,” Sunday Times, May 6, 2007.
[3] Schleifer, Yigal. “Turkey
votes to lift head-scarf ban, but battle continues.” Christian
Science Monitor, February 11, 2008.
|
|